<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Loves Bruner Blog  (Penis)</title>
	<link>http://bruner.net/2007/02/17/google-loves-bruner-blog-penis/</link>
	<description>All Bruner, All the Time*</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: coolman2k</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2007/02/17/google-loves-bruner-blog-penis/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>coolman2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2007/02/17/google-loves-bruner-blog-penis/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>It is strange that this blog shows up in the first page on google for so many keywords. For an example I have a site on &lt;a href='http://www.perfect-penis-enlargement.com' rel="nofollow"&gt;Penis Enlargement&lt;/a&gt; pills and it has everything it needs but id does not apear in first pages on google. 

How come the forum shows first in google page ranks?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is strange that this blog shows up in the first page on google for so many keywords. For an example I have a site on <a href='http://www.perfect-penis-enlargement.com' rel="nofollow">Penis Enlargement</a> pills and it has everything it needs but id does not apear in first pages on google. </p>
<p>How come the forum shows first in google page ranks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bruner</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2007/02/17/google-loves-bruner-blog-penis/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Bruner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2007/02/17/google-loves-bruner-blog-penis/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Um...a-doy? That's the whole point. I'm #1 for "unicycle sex" after all. You don't give that up lightly.



Penis, penis, penis, penis, penis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;a-doy? That&#8217;s the whole point. I&#8217;m #1 for &#8220;unicycle sex&#8221; after all. You don&#8217;t give that up lightly.</p>
<p>Penis, penis, penis, penis, penis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggth</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2007/02/17/google-loves-bruner-blog-penis/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>ggth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2007/02/17/google-loves-bruner-blog-penis/#comment-716</guid>
		<description>This kind of thing only begets more filth and should be largely ignored. Now you have instances of The [exact] terms used in the attempts to locate improbable filth that have  emanated from major search engines. Now every bot, spider, and search engine will be refortified with the notion

that your blog is  the place to go if you want to put your tiny penis in some chicken ass. Sure it's funny the first time, but not the 29th. It happened to me. People are still looking for info on Kentucky Fried Chicken franchises on the island of Malta [on my site ]because I stupidly mentioned that "refferrer logs say the darndest things" . That was four years ago. In fact, I have added fuel to the fire because I [re]mentioned some of the topics in this comment. This comment will be indexed with me as the author, you as the blogger, and TP and CA referenced twice,Once in the  body of your post, and once in my comment. Both of our names will be linked to these filthy topics, in perpetuity throughout the internet. Does your blog need the indescrimate publicity of being spidered and botted? I would have to reluctantly say yes, especially in your case . Someone needs  to come up with a way to privatize (sic) individual posts so that indexing of sensative material does not occur. Just think, anyone can masturbate to any picture they want to on Flickr (and I do mean any picture-even ones of dogs and Machinery) that much easier because people labeled their pictures or tagged them  or what ever those social software perves are calling it these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of thing only begets more filth and should be largely ignored. Now you have instances of The [exact] terms used in the attempts to locate improbable filth that have  emanated from major search engines. Now every bot, spider, and search engine will be refortified with the notion</p>
<p>that your blog is  the place to go if you want to put your tiny penis in some chicken ass. Sure it&#8217;s funny the first time, but not the 29th. It happened to me. People are still looking for info on Kentucky Fried Chicken franchises on the island of Malta [on my site ]because I stupidly mentioned that &#8220;refferrer logs say the darndest things&#8221; . That was four years ago. In fact, I have added fuel to the fire because I [re]mentioned some of the topics in this comment. This comment will be indexed with me as the author, you as the blogger, and TP and CA referenced twice,Once in the  body of your post, and once in my comment. Both of our names will be linked to these filthy topics, in perpetuity throughout the internet. Does your blog need the indescrimate publicity of being spidered and botted? I would have to reluctantly say yes, especially in your case . Someone needs  to come up with a way to privatize (sic) individual posts so that indexing of sensative material does not occur. Just think, anyone can masturbate to any picture they want to on Flickr (and I do mean any picture-even ones of dogs and Machinery) that much easier because people labeled their pictures or tagged them  or what ever those social software perves are calling it these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.353 seconds -->
