I’ve been busting a nut in recent years to stay in shape. I bike to work and/or hit the gym a few times a week when I can, and I do my best to eat right. (Okay, I did just move on to raw cookie dough this evening after already feeling guilty for consuming too many Xmas cookies.) For a man of my advanced years (41), I feel like I do pretty well.
Then I run into this lying sack of shit web page that purports to calculate your BMI (body mass index) based on your weight and height. In the interest of revealing way too much personal information on this blog, I’m somewhere between 5′11″ and 6′ and 170 to 175 lbs (weirdly, I normally weigh in at 172, my old street address growing up which is a number I seem to notice everywhere). According to aforementioned lyingsackofshit.com, that puts me a gerbil fart away from being “overweight.”
This chart on Wikipedia wants me to weigh between 130 and 170 to be “normal” weight. Let’s call it 150. WTF? “Normal”? As is, normative? The norm? Granted, we Amerikans are buckets of grease with legs compared to most of the rest of the world (though thank goodness they all seem to be following in our butt-chaffing waddle), but I used to be a scrawny kid, and I haven’t weighed 150, much less 130, since junior high school.
I see from Wikipedia the index was invented somewhere around 1830 to 1850, back when 6″ was a circus freak. Isn’t it time that the FDA or USDA or one of those other helpful organizations that tells us to eat heaping helpings of carbs every day and that cloned cows are good for us (mmm, clony) should revisit this thing?