<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye RSS, Hello Kinja</title>
	<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/</link>
	<description>All Bruner, All the Time*</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bruner</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Bruner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 17:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Ha! Joke's on you. I already &lt;a href="http://www.bruner.net/blog/archives/012173.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;amended the rules&lt;/a&gt; that mistakes in comments threads don't count.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Joke&#8217;s on you. I already <a href="http://www.bruner.net/blog/archives/012173.shtml" rel="nofollow">amended the rules</a> that mistakes in comments threads don&#8217;t count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bruner</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Bruner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 17:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>You better bring an expensive bottle of wine when you visit in May...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You better bring an expensive bottle of wine when you visit in May&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Travers</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Travers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Not a point for that, but I'll take one for "abastracts", thanks. And add another for the missing "is."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a point for that, but I&#8217;ll take one for &#8220;abastracts&#8221;, thanks. And add another for the missing &#8220;is.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bruner</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Bruner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 16:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Fine, Olivier, it abastracts, not summarizes. You want a point for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine, Olivier, it abastracts, not summarizes. You want a point for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Travers</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Travers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>OK, from what I can fathom at a quick glance, Kinja takes either the first sentence or two sentences of a post, presumably based on the length of the first one. Those are abstracts, not summaries. There is software that creates automatic summaries (e.g. http://www.copernic.com/en/products/summarizer/index.html) it's a lot more difficult that looking for a dot at the end of a sentence and counting characters in a string (maybe Kinja does more, such as looking at punctuation, you would have to feed it weird things such as a very long opening sentence or all lower cap text to see what it does with it). Even if your second sentence is the start of a quote, Kinja will take it but not the rest of the quote, which suggests it doesn't handle many exceptions. And all the examples I've seen are taken from the beginning of the post, so there's apparently no attempt at finding the most relevant or significant abstract within the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, from what I can fathom at a quick glance, Kinja takes either the first sentence or two sentences of a post, presumably based on the length of the first one. Those are abstracts, not summaries. There is software that creates automatic summaries (e.g. <a href="http://www.copernic.com/en/products/summarizer/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.copernic.com/en/products/summarizer/index.html</a>) it&#8217;s a lot more difficult that looking for a dot at the end of a sentence and counting characters in a string (maybe Kinja does more, such as looking at punctuation, you would have to feed it weird things such as a very long opening sentence or all lower cap text to see what it does with it). Even if your second sentence is the start of a quote, Kinja will take it but not the rest of the quote, which suggests it doesn&#8217;t handle many exceptions. And all the examples I&#8217;ve seen are taken from the beginning of the post, so there&#8217;s apparently no attempt at finding the most relevant or significant abstract within the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Travers</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Travers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 16:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>You can configure any web application server to interpret whatever extensions you want, regardless of the underlying technology. Even better is not to use extensions in your canonical URLs.



Are you sure it's a summary (in the semantic meaning), or rather just a well-formated abstract? I'll have to compare what comes up on Kinja vs. sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can configure any web application server to interpret whatever extensions you want, regardless of the underlying technology. Even better is not to use extensions in your canonical URLs.</p>
<p>Are you sure it&#8217;s a summary (in the semantic meaning), or rather just a well-formated abstract? I&#8217;ll have to compare what comes up on Kinja vs. sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I think you can do the same thing now on My Yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you can do the same thing now on My Yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bruner</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Bruner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>I would call that a "typo" not a "blunder," but fine, you get a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would call that a &#8220;typo&#8221; not a &#8220;blunder,&#8221; but fine, you get a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hall</title>
		<link>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bruner.net/2004/04/01/goodbye-rss-hello-kinja/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Spelling blunder: "...I'm writing, tht the objective..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spelling blunder: &#8220;&#8230;I&#8217;m writing, tht the objective&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.395 seconds -->
