Comments on: Dogville, Rhymes With Doggerel http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/ All Bruner, All the Time* Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:51:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: yahoo http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-200 yahoo Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:17:44 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-200 http://yahoo.com <a href="http://yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">qw</a> http://yahoo.com

qw

]]> By: chris http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-199 chris Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:37:14 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-199 where the hell am i? dogma 95 is a joke right? i see life in steady cam and it looks clear. perspective gives the illusion of a grainy shaky reality to eyes used to seeing "real" events in documentory form. what is not contrived about any artistic expression. and why do so many talented artists debase their abilities by insisting on "saying something" or using art as personal catharsis. what the fuck ever happened to art for arts sake? jesus weeps. where the hell am i?

dogma 95 is a joke right?

i see life in steady cam and it looks clear.

perspective gives the illusion of a grainy shaky reality to eyes used to seeing “real” events in documentory form.

what is not contrived about any artistic expression. and why do so many talented artists debase their abilities by insisting on “saying something” or using art as personal catharsis. what the fuck ever happened to art for arts sake?

jesus weeps.

]]> By: Viagra http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-198 Viagra Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:19:53 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-198 http://www.mixpills.com http://www.starpills.com http://www.cialishome.com http://www.mixpills.com

http://www.starpills.com

http://www.cialishome.com

]]> By: Debt Consolidation Loans http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-197 Debt Consolidation Loans Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:40:31 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-197 I thoroughly enjoyed reading everyones opinion on these matters. I thoroughly enjoyed reading everyones opinion on these matters.

]]> By: zoppini http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-196 zoppini Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:27:39 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-196 Ikrek, veled meginn?k egy s?rt egyszer. M?r ha szeretn?m a s?rt v. ha tudn?m ki ?s hol?! Ikrek, veled meginn?k egy s?rt egyszer. M?r ha szeretn?m a s?rt v. ha tudn?m ki ?s hol?!

]]> By: Hamide http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-195 Hamide Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:43:28 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-195 cool cool

]]> By: Hamide http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-194 Hamide Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:42:54 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-194 cool cool

]]> By: Doggy http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-193 Doggy Thu, 13 May 2004 12:52:26 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-193 Dogville should have been released this week, just in time for Leash Gal photos from Abu Ghraib! Life imitates art! The part where that movie crossed over into fable NOW ends up being point for point just like the images from Abu Ghriab! I'm sure the CIA "tightened their leash" on that movie now. Are you gonna apologize to Von Trier now? Dogville should have been released this week, just in time for Leash Gal photos from Abu Ghraib! Life imitates art! The part where that movie crossed over into fable NOW ends up being point for point just like the images from Abu Ghriab! I’m sure the CIA “tightened their leash” on that movie now. Are you gonna apologize to Von Trier now?

]]> By: Horn http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-192 Horn Sun, 18 Apr 2004 02:40:38 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-192 Any comments you had, regardless how derogatory, could not begin to describe just how fucked up and insulting this movie is. The director has replaced cinematography and acting with narration and out of focus camera work, and even more importantly, he replaced vision and talent with himself (which is tantamount to eliminating it). My instincts told me to leave after twenty seconds, but I stuck it out for twenty minutes, then left like a handful of others in an almost empty theatre in Austin. Later I learned that it was no more than three hours of anti-American bullshit. Drop your guard for one minute and the movie industry will stick it to you. Any comments you had, regardless how derogatory, could not begin to describe just how fucked up and insulting this movie is. The director has replaced cinematography and acting with narration and out of focus camera work, and even more importantly, he replaced vision and talent with himself (which is tantamount to eliminating it). My instincts told me to leave after twenty seconds, but I stuck it out for twenty minutes, then left like a handful of others in an almost empty theatre in Austin. Later I learned that it was no more than three hours of anti-American bullshit. Drop your guard for one minute and the movie industry will stick it to you.

]]> By: Rick Bruner http://www.bruner.net/2004/03/27/dogville-rhymes-with-doggerel/#comment-191 Rick Bruner Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:15:42 +0000 http://bruner.docgonzales.com/?p=1057#comment-191 I really don't want to milk this debate indefinitely, but just to clarify, Ikrek, to put my comment in context, I wrote "I can't give a proper review of this steaming pile of shit, as I didn't see it through to the end." I think there's a certain amount of intended irony in my "review" that's being lost. Anyway, do you really need to watch a Schwarzenegger film past the first 20 minutes to render an opinion about it? It wasn't the plot of Doggerel that I had problems with, it was the glaring artifice of it, which wasn't going to change if I'd stayed with it for another two hours. I really don’t want to milk this debate indefinitely, but just to clarify, Ikrek, to put my comment in context, I wrote “I can’t give a proper review of this steaming pile of shit, as I didn’t see it through to the end.”

I think there’s a certain amount of intended irony in my “review” that’s being lost. Anyway, do you really need to watch a Schwarzenegger film past the first 20 minutes to render an opinion about it? It wasn’t the plot of Doggerel that I had problems with, it was the glaring artifice of it, which wasn’t going to change if I’d stayed with it for another two hours.

]]>